(note for Sunday, August 16th, 2020: one of the paragraphs of a previous report for this site named "News for Saturday, August 15th, 2020" was corrected after it was originally published this Sunday)
- I had often thought of a certain idea I had believed would benefit broadcasts related to news and all living beings (including audiences for the broadcasts): no more discussions related to certain classifications or certain stereotypes for certain beings based on their complexions, ancestries, and/or their anatomies (note: this paragraph was inspired by my hearing of what I had believed to had been some voices being used to describe certain stereotypes for certain beings for certain discussions on a certain radio program on a certain radio frequency (104.1 megacycles) often connected to a certain radio station in southwest Alabama (named WDLT-FM) in certain calendar years prior to this one during the second half of the hour of 5:00 a.m. for this Sunday).
- If I were a presenter of news for a certain broadcast related to news, I would not want to use phrases like "good news" to describe certain subjects like certain parts of certain TV programming (with digital graphics involving texts of, "GOOD" appearing above some text of, "NEWS") I had seen through a certain channel (radio frequency channel 27-1/virtual channel 5-1) often connected to a certain TV station in southwest Alabama (named WKRG-TV) during certain calendar years prior to this one earlier this calendar year (examples of other phrases like "good news" I would not want to use to describe certain subjects while being a presenter of news for certain TV programs related to news: "bad news", "sad news", "tragic news", "fortunate news", "unfortunate news", "crazy news", "bizarre news", "outrageous news", "happy news", and "uplifting news").
No comments:
Post a Comment